3rd September 2025
In June 2024, the Ta’ang National Liberation Army (TNLA), as part of the Three Brotherhood Alliance, launched a sweeping offensive across northern Shan State. After weeks of fighting, the TNLA seized control of Nawnghkio, a town that straddles the vital Mandalay–Muse highway (AH14) and the railway line linking central Myanmar with China. Holding Nawnghkio gave the TNLA a major prize: it disrupted the junta’s logistics, cut access to the border trade routes, and symbolically showed that ethnic resistance forces could seize and administer territory far beyond their traditional strongholds.
Over the following months, the TNLA dug in. They established a defensive perimeter north of the town, placed strongpoints in surrounding wards, and created a civil administration in Nawnghkio itself. Reports in late 2024 and early 2025 described the TNLA collecting taxes, regulating transport, and coordinating with allied People’s Defence Forces (PDFs). The town became both a forward operating base and a political showcase of resistance strength.
The junta could not ignore this. Nawnghkio lay just north of Pyin Oo Lwin — a military garrison city east of Mandalay — and losing it was a strategic and political humiliation. Beginning in April 2025, the Tatmadaw launched a counteroffensive aimed at retaking the town and reopening the Mandalay–Muse corridor. Government forces advanced north from Pyin Oo Lwin, securing Ummathi, Kan Gyi, Namhsaunghu, and Gokteik before pushing on toward Nawnghkio. Heavy artillery and air strikes accompanied the advance, with local sources describing daily bombardments.
By mid-July 2025, after three months of fighting, the military claimed success. On 18 July 2025, the junta announced that its forces had recaptured Nawnghkio, releasing photos of soldiers inside the town’s market, police station, and administration offices. State media reported that six wards had been cleared and that supply lines were once again open.
The TNLA, however, did not acknowledge defeat. Its leadership stated that units had “moved to safe locations” and continued operations in the wider Nawnghkio township. Residents reported ongoing clashes in surrounding areas, with control of outlying villages contested. The recapture was therefore a claim of control by the junta, not a clean break in the fighting. For the TNLA, simply holding Nawnghkio for more than a year was already a political and military success: it had forced the Tatmadaw into a grinding battle that strained manpower, resources, and credibility.
TNLA Defenders: Arrayed in a northern arc leading into Nawnghkio, dug into urban hexes such as Hsipaw South and the approaches along the Lashio road. Though outgunned, their numerical advantage and defensive positions make them a formidable obstacle. Their objective is to bleed and delay, preserving combat strength even if forced to withdraw.
Myanmar Attackers: Massed south of the Gotiek Bridge and the valley approaches, preparing to storm Nawnghkio. They enjoy superior airpower and artillery, but suffer from coordination problems and fragile morale. Their aim is to break into the town quickly and secure its wards before international attention or attrition undermines the offensive.
Terrain: Northern Shan State is rugged and compartmentalised. The Gotiek Bridge is a chokepoint on the main supply route; without it, the offensive cannot be sustained. Urban hexes within Nawnghkio give defenders maximum cover. Agricultural valleys expose advancing attackers to fire from the hills, making the assault costly.
Primary Objective: Capture Nawnghkio’s urban hexes (market, police, administration).
Secondary Objective: Keep the Gotiek Bridge and the Mandalay–Muse road open to consolidate gains.
Operational Risk: Command failures or high casualties can turn a tactical victory into a strategic loss.
Primary Objective: Hold the northern arc long enough to delay or disrupt the junta’s offensive.
Secondary Objective: Inflict maximum losses and preserve forces by withdrawing in good order to safe locations if necessary.
Victory Condition: Even if Nawnghkio itself falls, the TNLA “wins” historically if the junta cannot stabilise the area.
This is a simulation of events, not a balanced battle. Historically, the junta’s recapture was contested: it claimed control on 18 July 2025, but the TNLA continued fighting in the surrounding township.
Players should consider:
Could the Tatmadaw have coordinated better and achieved a cleaner victory?
Could the TNLA have held the town outright rather than trading space for time?
What were the real causes of the junta’s attrition — terrain, morale, or command?